The Rhetoric DiariesWriting · Technology · Belonging
Selected teaching case

Creative-Analytical Composition

A public teaching case on a connected creative-composition sequence that moves from character and worldbuilding to research and public repair.

Composition sequence · Ongoing classroom practice

This sequence uses imaginative writing as an entry point to rhetorical analysis, research, and public-facing intervention. It does not treat creativity as a break from academic work; it uses character and world to make systems, values, consequences, and audiences visible.

Sequence logic

From character to world repair

A character-based self-portrait asks students to consider how voice, detail, structure, and contradiction construct identity. Worldbuilding then shifts attention outward: what rules, institutions, resources, and social expectations shape what people can do or imagine?

When students develop an opposing figure, they must account for motive, conflict, and competing values rather than treating a problem as self-evident. The final World Repair Proposal carries that work into research: students investigate a problem, test possible responses against evidence and constraints, and translate an argument for a defined public audience.

Projects

Four connected assignments

  • The Character’s Self-Portrait: Students analyze how rhetorical choices construct a character and invite interpretation.
  • The Worldbuilding Essay: Students examine how systems, values, rules, and audiences shape a fictional or speculative world.
  • The Opposition Speaks: Students develop an opposing perspective and analyze conflict, motive, and rhetorical positioning.
  • The World Repair Proposal: Students research a problem and design a context-sensitive public response for a real audience.
What carries forward

Imagination becomes a way to see systems

Each project supplies material for the next. Students carry forward earlier decisions about voice, systems, stakeholders, and conflict; they then test those decisions against research, evidence, counterarguments, access, and feasibility. The aim is not for every student to disclose personal experience. Invented, observed, historical, textual, and community contexts are all valid starting points.

Public boundary

A case, not a course archive

This page describes the sequence’s design and learning logic. It does not reproduce private syllabi, student work, grades, feedback, or internal instructional records.